Appearance
question:A pack of 150 customized pens costs 45. How much would it cost to purchase 3600 pens?
answer:1. **Calculate the cost per pen**: The cost per pen can be calculated by dividing the total cost by the number of pens in a pack. [ text{Cost per pen} = frac{45}{150} = 0.30 text{ per pen} ] 2. **Calculate the total cost for 3600 pens**: Multiply the cost per pen by the total number of pens desired. [ text{Total cost} = 3600 times 0.30 = 1080 ] 3. **Conclusion**: Therefore, buying 3600 pens would cost boxed{1080}.
question:A certain family has 3 sons: Richard is 6 years older than David, and David is some years older than Scott. In 8 years, Richard will be twice as old as Scott. David was 12 years old 2 years ago. How many years older is David than Scott?
answer:Let's denote the current ages of the three brothers as follows: - Richard's current age = R - David's current age = D - Scott's current age = S From the information given, we can set up the following equations: 1. Richard is 6 years older than David: R = D + 6 2. David was 12 years old 2 years ago, so his current age is: D = 12 + 2 D = 14 3. In 8 years, Richard will be twice as old as Scott: R + 8 = 2(S + 8) Now we can substitute the value of D into the first equation to find R: R = D + 6 R = 14 + 6 R = 20 Now we have Richard's current age. Let's use this information in the third equation to find Scott's current age: R + 8 = 2(S + 8) 20 + 8 = 2(S + 8) 28 = 2S + 16 28 - 16 = 2S 12 = 2S S = 12 / 2 S = 6 Scott's current age is 6 years. Now we can find out how many years older David is than Scott: D - S = 14 - 6 D - S = 8 David is boxed{8} years older than Scott.
question:To promote our country's excellent traditional culture, the city's education bureau conducted an idiom dictation test for all primary and secondary school students in the city. After big data analysis, it was found that the scores of this dictation test approximately follow a normal distribution (N(78,16)). Try to estimate the percentage of students whose test scores are not less than (90) based on the knowledge of normal distribution. The percentage is approximately (() ()). (()Reference data: (P(μσ < X leqslant μ+σ)=0.683), (P(μ2σ < X leqslant μ+2σ)=0.954), (P(μ3σ < X leqslant μ+3σ)=0.997).) A: (0.13%) B: (1.3%) C: (3%) D: (3.3%)
answer:【Analysis】 This question examines the probability calculation of the normal distribution, which is a basic question. By the given information, we find (μ=78), (σ=4). According to (P(66 < X < 90)=P(μ-3σ < X leqslant μ+3σ)), we calculate the value of (P(66 < X < 90)), and then use the symmetry of the normal distribution to solve the problem. 【Solution】 Given the normal distribution (N(78,16)), we have (μ=78), (σ=4), Then (P(66 < X < 90)=P(78-3×4 < X < 78+3×4)=0.997). (∴P(X geqslant 90)=dfrac{1}{2} (1-0.997)=0.0015). Thus, the estimated percentage of students whose test scores are not less than (90) is (0.13%). Therefore, the correct choice is (boxed{text{A}}).
question:Given (a > 0), (b in mathbb{R}), the function (f(x) = 4ax^2 2bx a + b) is defined on the domain ([0,1]) (Ⅰ) When (a=1), the function (f(x)) has two different zeros within its domain, find the range of (b); (Ⅱ) Let the maximum value of (f(x)) be (M), prove that: (f(x) + M > 0).
answer:Solution: (Ⅰ) When (a=1), the function becomes (f(x) = 4x^2 - 2bx - 1 + b), Let (f(x) = 0), then (x = frac{1}{2}), or (x = frac{-1+b}{2}), If the function (f(x)) has two different zeros within the domain ([0,1]), then (frac{-1+b}{2} in [0,1]), and (frac{-1+b}{2} neq frac{1}{2}), Solving this gives: (b in [1,2) cup (2,3]) Thus, the range of (b) is boxed{[1,2) cup (2,3]}. Proof: (Ⅱ) To prove: (f(x) + M > 0), which means to prove: (f(x)_{text{max}} + f(x)_{text{min}} > 0) Since the graph of (f(x) = 4ax^2 - 2bx - a + b) is an upward-opening parabola, symmetric about the line (x = frac{b}{4a}), ① If (frac{b}{4a} < 0), or (frac{b}{4a} > 1), then (f(x)_{text{max}} + f(x)_{text{min}} = f(0) + f(1) = -a + b + 3a - b = 2a > 0); ② If (0 leqslant frac{b}{4a} < frac{1}{2}), i.e., (0 leqslant b < 2a), then (f(x)_{text{max}} + f(x)_{text{min}} = f(frac{b}{4a}) + f(1) = -a + b - frac{b^2}{4a} + 3a - b = 2a - frac{b^2}{4a} = frac{8a^2 - b^2}{4a} > frac{4a^2}{4a} = a > 0); ③ If (frac{1}{2} leqslant frac{b}{4a} leqslant 1), i.e., (2a leqslant b leqslant 4a), then (f(x)_{text{max}} + f(x)_{text{min}} = f(frac{b}{4a}) + f(0) = -a + b - frac{b^2}{4a} - a + b = 2b - 2a - frac{b^2}{4a} = frac{8ab - 8a^2 - b^2}{4a} = frac{-(b-4a)^2 + 8a^2}{4a} geqslant frac{4a^2}{4a} = a > 0); Therefore, it is always true that (f(x)_{text{max}} + f(x)_{text{min}} > 0), which means (f(x) + M > 0) is proven.